H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Glynis Oconnor H2H: 0-1

Glynis Oconnor holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Glynis Oconnor leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Glynis Oconnor won the 1980 Tampa round of 64 6-1 0-6 6-3.

USA Age 69
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Glynis Oconnor 6-1 0-6 6-3 Kim Jones Match data Nov 12, 1980* R64 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones — — — 1,801 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Glynis Oconnor — — — 1,513 1 1 50.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Kim Jones Glynis Oconnor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0
1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,423 0 0 — — — — — — —
1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,758 0 1 — — — — — — —
1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —
1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1 — — — — — — —
1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Kim Jones Glynis Oconnor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4% Career 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Kim Jones Glynis Oconnor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08 1980 1499 97.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 0–1 — +0.30
1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +38 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 1484 104.0 — — — — -68 -7 +112 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1758 132.1 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 1668 132.8 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 1725 135.7 — — — — -9 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 1678 104.5 — — — — -13 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 1630 104.2 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1801 126.5 — — — — -6 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.77 Career 1513 98.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 0–1 — +15.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.