H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Grace Kim H2H: 1-1

Kim Jones and Grace Kim are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Jones leads 1–0 on carpet, while Grace Kim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grace Kim won the 1984 Canadian Open round of 16 2-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Jones
USA Age 69
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Grace Kim
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grace Kim 2-6 6-3 6-3 Kim Jones Match data Aug 24, 1984* R16 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Kim Jones 6-2 6-4 Grace Kim Match data Sep 29, 1983* R32 Hartford WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones — — — 1,801 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,586 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,592 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1
20 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1
21 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,423 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,758 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.40
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1592 116.1 — — — — +64 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1622 113.9 — — — — +26 — +20 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.34
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1695 125.4 — — — — +51 -205 -136 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.71
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1606 117.9 — — — — +47 -127 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 +0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +46 — -16 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.11
20 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26
21 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +38 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1982 1484 104.0 — — — — -68 -7 +112 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1983 1758 132.1 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1984 1668 132.8 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1985 1725 135.7 — — — — -9 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 1678 104.5 — — — — -13 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 1630 104.2 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1801 126.5 — — — — -6 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.77 — 1706 119.2 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.