H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kim Jones vs Laura Arraya H2H: 2-0
Kim Jones holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Jones leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1984 New Orleans third round 6-7 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1984* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kim Jones | 6-7 7-6 6-4 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kim Jones | 6-2 6-3 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Jones | — | — | — | 1,801 | 60 | 103 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Jones | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1980 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1981 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1984 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1985 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |