H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Laura Arraya H2H: 2-0

Kim Jones holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Jones leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1984 New Orleans round of 32 6-7 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Jones

USA Age 68

H2H

2 – 0

2 main draw meetings

Laura Arraya

PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Kim Jones	6-7 7-6 6-4	Laura Arraya #21	Match data	Sep 27, 1984*	R32	New Orleans	WTA 250	Carpet
Kim Jones	6-2 6-3	Laura Arraya #22	Match data	Aug 30, 1984*	R128	US Open	Grand Slam	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Kim Jones	—	—	—	1,800	60	103	36.8%	0	0	0	0	1	1
Laura Arraya	#192	#14	51	1,922	270	204	57.0%	0	0	0	0	10	10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Kim Jones							Laura Arraya
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	19–8	70.4%	—	1,685	0	4
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	33–17	66.0%	—	1,741	0	7
19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	23–23	50.0%	—	1,712	0	7
20	1978	1–1	50.0%	—	1,506	0	0	1984	29–18	61.7%	#34	1,759	0	8
21	1979	0–1	0.0%	—	1,489	0	0	1985	17–21	44.7%	#63	1,691	0	8
22	1980	1–10	9.1%	—	1,422	0	0	1986	23–24	48.9%	#33	1,718	0	8
23	1981	6–13	31.6%	—	1,458	0	0	1987	16–14	53.3%	#45	1,770	0	8
24	1982	4–14	22.2%	—	1,483	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1983	20–14	58.8%	—	1,757	0	1	1989	27–12	69.2%	#19	1,882	0	10
26	1984	13–24	35.1%	—	1,667	0	1	1990	26–19	57.8%	#21	1,821	0	10
27	1985	13–18	41.9%	—	1,724	0	1	1991	28–17	62.2%	#24	1,823	0	10
28	1986	2–4	33.3%	—	1,677	0	1	1992	20–19	51.3%	#45	1,732	0	10
29	1987	0–4	0.0%	—	1,629	0	1	1993	9–12	42.9%	#71	1,682	0	10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Kim Jones																	Laura Arraya
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	1	2	3	33.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	10	6	16	62.5%	23	10	33	69.7%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	10	8	18	55.6%	10	11	21	47.6%	—	—	—	—	2	3	5	40.0%
20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	7	7	14	50.0%	19	7	26	73.1%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%
21	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1985	9	9	18	50.0%	7	9	16	43.8%	—	—	—	—	1	3	4	25.0%
22	1980	0	6	6	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	1986	3	7	10	30.0%	14	8	22	63.6%	0	2	2	0.0%	6	7	13	46.2%
23	1981	2	3	5	40.0%	3	5	8	37.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	4	5	20.0%	1987	7	5	12	58.3%	7	8	15	46.7%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—
24	1982	0	4	4	0.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1983	5	5	10	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	6	4	10	60.0%	9	4	13	69.2%	1989	15	3	18	83.3%	5	5	10	50.0%	4	2	6	66.7%	3	2	5	60.0%
26	1984	4	6	10	40.0%	2	4	6	33.3%	2	7	9	22.2%	5	7	12	41.7%	1990	13	6	19	68.4%	7	6	13	53.8%	2	2	4	50.0%	4	5	9	44.4%
27	1985	4	7	11	36.4%	—	—	—	—	3	3	6	50.0%	6	8	14	42.9%	1991	18	12	30	60.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	4	1	5	80.0%	3	1	4	75.0%
28	1986	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1992	8	9	17	47.1%	5	4	9	55.6%	2	1	3	66.7%	5	5	10	50.0%
29	1987	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	3	3	0.0%	1993	4	6	10	40.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	0	3	3	0.0%	3	2	5	60.0%
Career	—	17	35	52	32.7%	6	15	21	28.6%	13	17	30	43.3%	23	34	57	40.4%	—	105	80	185	56.8%	103	73	176	58.5%	16	14	30	53.3%	28	31	59	47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Kim Jones																Laura Arraya
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	1685	129.1	—	—	—	—	-70	—	—	65.6%	+0.74	5–2 (71%)	3–1 (75%)	—	-1.24
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	1742	126.9	—	—	—	—	-61	-27	—	62.7%	+0.91	10–8 (56%)	8–5 (62%)	—	+2.71
19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	1713	125.7	—	—	—	—	+8	+30	—	51.4%	-0.24	8–11 (42%)	3–4 (43%)	—	+0.84
20	1978	1506	102.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	-0.75	—	—	—	-0.08	1984	1760	130.6	—	—	—	—	-102	+141	-132	53.8%	+0.03	18–5 (78%)	9–4 (69%)	—	+0.94
21	1979	1490	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	+0.09	1985	1692	124.9	—	—	—	—	-2	+60	—	45.1%	-0.27	8–7 (53%)	3–2 (60%)	—	+1.84
22	1980	1423	94.6	—	—	—	—	+36	—	—	27.6%	-1.83	1–6 (14%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.50	1986	1718	138.1	—	—	—	—	-26	+100	—	51.0%	-0.04	5–7 (42%)	5–6 (45%)	—	-1.79
23	1981	1459	107.5	—	—	—	—	+44	+75	—	34.9%	-1.44	2–3 (40%)	1–0	—	+1.50	1987	1770	133.4	—	—	—	—	-31	-11	-184	51.6%	+0.05	3–1 (75%)	0–3 (0%)	—	-2.60
24	1982	1484	103.7	—	—	—	—	-68	-7	+110	25.0%	-2.15	2–2 (50%)	1–2 (33%)	—	-0.59	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1983	1758	131.9	—	—	—	—	-40	—	-92	54.3%	+0.41	9–4 (69%)	3–6 (33%)	—	+1.43	1989	1883	136.8	—	—	—	—	-8	-146	-254	65.2%	+0.79	7–4 (64%)	3–2 (60%)	—	+0.41
26	1984	1667	132.6	—	—	—	—	+24	-136	-35	40.2%	-0.94	5–9 (36%)	5–5 (50%)	—	-3.22	1990	1821	141.9	—	—	—	—	+31	-55	-173	55.4%	+0.46	7–4 (64%)	5–8 (38%)	—	+0.41
27	1985	1725	135.5	—	—	—	—	-10	—	-76	43.7%	-0.72	4–5 (44%)	7–4 (64%)	—	-1.52	1991	1823	132.7	—	—	—	—	+13	-70	-95	56.9%	+0.19	10–4 (71%)	5–4 (56%)	—	+2.96
28	1986	1677	104.5	—	—	—	—	-12	—	—	40.0%	-0.47	1–2 (33%)	1–1	—	+0.70	1992	1733	139.0	—	—	—	—	+2	+53	+3	49.4%	+0.06	5–6 (45%)	4–5 (44%)	—	+1.62
29	1987	1629	103.9	—	—	—	—	-23	—	—	11.1%	-2.67	0–1	—	—	-0.24	1993	1682	125.0	—	—	—	—	+13	+124	+9	44.0%	-0.66	4–4 (50%)	2–0	—	-0.06
Career	—	1801	126.3	—	—	—	—	-7	-14	-43	40.1%	-0.88	24–32 (43%)	19–20 (49%)	100.6	-0.88	—	1923	138.4	—	—	—	—	-10	+27	-133	54.6%	+0.19	90–63 (59%)	50–44 (53%)	104.5	+1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Kim Jones's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Pam Shriver	1	5	6	Sep 20, 1985	H2H
Virginia Ruzici	2	3	5	Jan 30, 1985	H2H
Jo Durie	1	3	4	Jun 26, 1985	H2H
Zina Garrison	1	2	3	Nov 8, 1985	H2H
Chris Evert	0	3	3	Sep 28, 1985	H2H

Laura Arraya's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Mareen Louie Harper	5	3	8	Jan 31, 1992	H2H
Lori Mcneil	2	5	7	Oct 23, 1992	H2H
Pilar Vasquez	6	1	7	Jan 16, 1991	H2H
Patricia Medrado	5	2	7	Oct 9, 1986	H2H
Akiko Kijimuta	6	0	6	Feb 1, 1992	H2H