H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Leigh Anne Thompson H2H: 1-1

Kim Jones and Leigh Anne Thompson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Jones leads 1–0 on clay, while Leigh Anne Thompson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1984 Amelia Island round of 64 3-6 6-4 7-5.

USA Age 68
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Jones 3-6 6-4 7-5 Leigh Anne Thompson Match data Apr 18, 1984* R64 Amelia Island Category 4 modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Leigh Anne Thompson 6-1 6-1 Kim Jones Match data Sep 4, 1981* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Leigh Anne Thompson 1,792 42 73 36.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Leigh Anne Thompson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1981 4–5 44.4% 1,542 0 0
18 1982 20–23 46.5% 1,765 0 1
19 1983 7–17 29.2% 1,715 0 1
20 1978 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0 1984 0–8 0.0% 1,589 0 1
21 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0 1985 6–11 35.3% 1,594 0 1
22 1980 1–10 9.1% 1,422 0 0 1986 5–9 35.7% 1,555 0 1
23 1981 6–13 31.6% 1,458 0 0
24 1982 4–14 22.2% 1,483 0 0
25 1983 20–14 58.8% 1,757 0 1
26 1984 13–24 35.1% 1,667 0 1
27 1985 13–18 41.9% 1,724 0 1
28 1986 2–4 33.3% 1,677 0 1
29 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,629 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Jones Leigh Anne Thompson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1982 7 2 9 77.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
19 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 8 12 33.3%
20 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
Career 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4% 16 25 41 39.0% 13 20 33 39.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 13 22 35 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Leigh Anne Thompson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1981 1543 110.4 +61 +27 47.6% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.41
18 1982 1765 135.1 +1 -160 -227 45.7% -0.04 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.7 -0.61
19 1983 1715 134.4 +4 -84 38.8% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 1–1 -2.18
20 1978 1506 102.4 50.0% -0.75 -0.08 1984 1590 92.8 +12 -27 11.1% -2.33 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.15
21 1979 1490 +0.09 1985 1594 115.3 +21 36.8% -0.66 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) +0.16
22 1980 1423 94.6 +36 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50 1986 1556 101.1 -8 -18 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 +1.93
23 1981 1459 107.5 +44 +75 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +1.50
24 1982 1484 103.7 -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59
25 1983 1758 131.9 -40 -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43
26 1984 1667 132.6 +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22
27 1985 1725 135.5 -10 -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52
28 1986 1677 104.5 -12 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.70
29 1987 1629 103.9 -23 11.1% -2.67 0–1 -0.24
Career 1801 126.3 -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88 1793 126.6 +9 -96 -227 40.5% -0.53 10–22 (31%) 9–13 (41%) 89.9 -0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.