H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Lucia Romanov H2H: 0-1

Lucia Romanov holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucia Romanov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lucia Romanov won the 1981 Minneapolis round of 32 6-1 3-6 6-2.

USA Age 69
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lucia Romanov 6-1 3-6 6-2 Kim Jones Match data Oct 1, 1981* R32 Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones — — — 1,801 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lucia Romanov — — — 1,798 47 78 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Kim Jones Lucia Romanov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,555 0 0
1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1980 9–16 36.0% — 1,613 0 0
1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,423 0 0 1981 10–14 41.7% — 1,682 0 0
1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,459 0 0 1982 13–12 52.0% — 1,756 0 0
1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0 1983 6–18 25.0% — 1,597 0 0
1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,758 0 1 1984 6–13 31.6% — 1,510 0 0
1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —
1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1 — — — — — — —
1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Kim Jones Lucia Romanov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 7 9 22.2%
1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4% Career 14 22 36 38.9% 21 26 47 44.7% 6 11 17 35.3% 6 18 24 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Kim Jones Lucia Romanov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08 1979 1555 122.8 — — — — — +17 — 42.9% -0.50 — 1–0 — -0.09
1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09 1980 1614 121.1 — — — — +8 -60 — 40.7% -0.63 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +38 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.48 1981 1683 132.5 — — — — -37 +21 -152 41.8% -0.58 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — -2.15
1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.57 1982 1757 135.4 — — — — -152 +5 -112 46.3% -0.41 5–3 (63%) 0–1 — -1.28
1982 1484 104.0 — — — — -68 -7 +112 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.61 1983 1598 101.9 — — — — -77 +83 +24 29.6% -1.41 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +0.28
1983 1758 132.1 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.44 1984 1510 103.1 — — — — -25 +121 — 39.1% -0.78 2–6 (25%) 0–2 — +1.87
1984 1668 132.8 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 1725 135.7 — — — — -9 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 1678 104.5 — — — — -13 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 1630 104.2 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1801 126.5 — — — — -6 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.77 Career 1798 125.3 — — — — -45 +41 -93 39.7% -0.75 15–20 (43%) 4–5 (44%) 99.5 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.