H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Jones vs Trey Lewis H2H: 1-0

Kim Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Trey Lewis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Jones leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1980 Atlanta round of 32 6-7 7-6 6-4.

USA Age 68
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Jones 6-7 7-6 6-4 Trey Lewis Match data Sep 25, 1980* R32 Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Jones 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Trey Lewis 1,536 23 53 30.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Jones Trey Lewis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1978 2–2 50.0% 1,503 0 0
19 1979 3–4 42.9% 1,521 0 1
20 1978 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0 1980 6–14 30.0% 1,516 0 1
21 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0 1981 4–10 28.6% 1,521 0 1
22 1980 1–10 9.1% 1,422 0 0 1982 3–10 23.1% 1,482 0 1
23 1981 6–13 31.6% 1,458 0 0 1983 3–7 30.0% 1,477 0 1
24 1982 4–14 22.2% 1,483 0 0 1984 2–5 28.6% 1,447 0 1
25 1983 20–14 58.8% 1,757 0 1 1985 0–1 0.0% 1,442 0 1
26 1984 13–24 35.1% 1,667 0 1
27 1985 13–18 41.9% 1,724 0 1
28 1986 2–4 33.3% 1,677 0 1
29 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,629 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Jones Trey Lewis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1979 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
21 1981 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
Career 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4% 11 24 35 31.4% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 9 11 18.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Jones Trey Lewis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1978 1503 104.8 50.0% +0.60 1–1 0–1 +0.13
19 1979 1521 113.5 +81 +56 47.1% -0.12 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.1 +0.87
20 1978 1506 102.4 50.0% -0.75 -0.08 1980 1517 113.6 +29 33.3% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 97.3 +1.11
21 1979 1490 +0.09 1981 1521 114.4 +64 +7 41.7% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 2–4 (33%) 93.5 -0.13
22 1980 1423 94.6 +36 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50 1982 1482 106.8 +22 +3 37.1% -0.69 2–7 (22%) 0–2 +0.82
23 1981 1459 107.5 +44 +75 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +1.50 1983 1477 100.3 +11 +60 39.1% -0.57 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +0.75
24 1982 1484 103.7 -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59 1984 1448 90.5 -2 29.4% -1.06 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +1.08
25 1983 1758 131.9 -40 -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43 1985 1442 100.3 33.3% -1.33 0–1 -0.03
26 1984 1667 132.6 +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22
27 1985 1725 135.5 -10 -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52
28 1986 1677 104.5 -12 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.70
29 1987 1629 103.9 -23 11.1% -2.67 0–1 -0.24
Career 1801 126.3 -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88 1536 111.0 +32 +17 +60 38.2% -0.69 9–25 (26%) 6–20 (23%) 82.9 +6.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.