H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Amanda Brown H2H: 1-0

Kim Sands holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Brown in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Sands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1984 Denver quarterfinal 7-5 6-1.

USA Age 69
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Sands 7-5 6-1 Amanda Brown Match data Jan 21, 1984* QF Denver WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Sands 1,713 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amanda Brown 1,653 48 55 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Amanda Brown
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–3 25.0% 1,475 0 0
16 1981 9–4 69.2% 1,559 0 0
17 1982 12–4 75.0% 1,635 0 0
18 1983 7–12 36.8% 1,595 0 1
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0 1984 14–18 43.8% 1,611 0 1
20 1985 5–13 27.8% 1,577 0 1
21 1978 4–4 50.0% 1,512 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,556 0 1
22 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,490 0 0
23 1980 11–22 33.3% 1,583 0 0
24 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,560 0 0
25 1982 3–16 15.8% 1,502 0 0
26 1983 12–13 48.0% 1,622 0 0
27 1984 10–23 30.3% 1,557 0 0
28 1985 3–8 27.3% 1,545 0 0
29 1986 1–10 9.1% 1,479 0 0
30 1987 0–3 0.0% 1,455 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Sands Amanda Brown
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1981 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1982 2 0 2 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1983 2 4 6 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1978 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1980 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5%
24 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2%
25 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 18 35 53 34.0% 9 30 39 23.1% 12 24 36 33.3% 14 33 47 29.8% 13 15 28 46.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Sands Amanda Brown
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1476 101.6 25.0% -1.00 -0.05
16 1981 1560 119.3 66.7% +1.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.47
17 1982 1635 123.4 -58 73.5% +2.32 1–1 2–0 +2.21
18 1983 1596 107.2 -21 -2 38.1% -0.79 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +0.68
19 1976 1489 94.4 0.0% -5.50 -0.17 1984 1611 109.9 -60 -13 +27 44.6% -0.58 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 103.1 +1.65
20 1985 1578 109.4 -9 -25 29.3% -1.41 3–2 (60%) 1–1 -0.07
21 1978 1512 108.5 +52 57.1% +0.72 1–4 (20%) 0–1 +1.67 1986 1556 98.8 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.31
22 1979 1490 96.5 20.0% -1.60 0–1 +0.15
23 1980 1583 118.8 +6 -110 -44 32.5% -1.52 8–3 (73%) 1–3 (25%) 105.8 -0.85
24 1981 1560 111.4 -8 -100 +50 35.7% -1.06 3–7 (30%) 1–1 +0.95
25 1982 1503 104.0 +5 -143 +77 23.3% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -0.85
26 1983 1623 121.1 -14 -159 -27 51.6% 0.00 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 +1.37
27 1984 1557 125.8 +50 -118 -7 31.9% -1.14 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.6 -1.83
28 1985 1546 109.7 +25 -108 33.3% -1.26 2–3 (40%) 1–1 +0.26
29 1986 1480 109.1 +10 20.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.5 +0.18
30 1987 1456 103.5 14.3% -2.28 0–1 -0.17
Career 1714 119.0 +12 -124 +20 34.9% -1.08 23–37 (38%) 10–19 (34%) 92.4 +0.40 1654 115.8 -38 -36 +1 46.7% -0.16 12–13 (48%) 13–8 (62%) 102.5 +5.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.