H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kim Sands vs Amanda Tobin H2H: 1-0
Kim Sands holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Tobin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Sands leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1978 Adelaide third round 6-3 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1978* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Kim Sands | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Amanda Tobin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amanda Tobin | #351 | #138 | 4 | 1,624 | 45 | 77 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Amanda Tobin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #138 | 1,502 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #210 | 1,470 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |