H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kim Sands vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-1
Andrea Jaeger holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1980 Detroit third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 1980* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Jaeger | 6-1 6-2 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Andrea Jaeger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |