H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-1

Andrea Jaeger holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1980 Detroit round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Sands
USA Age 69
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger 6-1 6-2 Kim Sands Match data Feb 21, 1980* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Sands — — — 1,713 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 — 2,266 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1980 62–18 77.5% #7 2,143 0 4
16 — — — — — — — 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,178 0 7
17 — — — — — — — 1982 65–20 76.5% #3 2,201 0 9
18 — — — — — — — 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,103 0 10
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,024 0 10
20 — — — — — — — 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,939 0 10
21 1978 4–4 50.0% — 1,512 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,914 0 10
22 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,899 0 10
23 1980 11–22 33.3% — 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1981 9–21 30.0% — 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1982 3–16 15.8% — 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1983 12–13 48.0% — 1,622 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1984 10–23 30.3% — 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1985 3–8 27.3% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1986 1–10 9.1% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1987 0–3 0.0% — 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Sands Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1522 114.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2144 166.9 — — — — -20 -413 -289 74.1% +1.97 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) 111.4 -7.47
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2178 174.5 — — — — +36 -158 -155 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.9 -9.68
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2202 173.8 — — — — +57 -30 -141 74.7% +1.94 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2104 170.1 — — — — -4 +148 +47 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.2 -3.88
19 1976 1489 94.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17 1984 2024 144.8 — — — — +14 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1939 112.7 — — — — +11 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.47
21 1978 1512 108.5 — — — — — — +52 57.1% +0.72 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +1.67 1986 1914 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1979 1490 96.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.15 1987 1900 104.0 — — — — — +249 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.16
23 1980 1583 118.8 — — — — +6 -110 -44 32.5% -1.52 8–3 (73%) 1–3 (25%) 105.8 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1560 111.4 — — — — -8 -100 +50 35.7% -1.06 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1503 104.0 — — — — +5 -143 +77 23.3% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1623 121.1 — — — — -14 -159 -27 51.6% 0.00 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 +1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1557 125.8 — — — — +50 -118 -7 31.9% -1.14 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.6 -1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1546 109.7 — — — — +25 -108 — 33.3% -1.26 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1480 109.1 — — — — +10 — — 20.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.5 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1456 103.5 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1714 119.0 — — — — +12 -124 +20 34.9% -1.08 23–37 (38%) 10–19 (34%) 92.4 +0.40 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +18 -41 -153 71.0% +1.72 44–18 (71%) 21–18 (54%) 107.9 -8.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.