H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kim Sands vs Andrea Leand H2H: 0-1
Andrea Leand holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Leand leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrea Leand won the 1982 Eastbourne second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1982* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Andrea Leand | 6-4 6-4 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Andrea Leand | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 |