H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kim Sands vs Ann Henricksson H2H: 0-2
Ann Henricksson holds a 2–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ann Henricksson leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ann Henricksson won the 1985 Birmingham second round 7-6 6-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1985* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Ann Henricksson | 7-6 6-7 6-2 | Kim Sands | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1980* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Ann Henricksson | 6-4 6-3 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ann Henricksson | #892 | #36 | 21 | 1,756 | 147 | 210 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Ann Henricksson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #49 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #60 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #71 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #141 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #215 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |