H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kim Sands vs Barbara Potter H2H: 0-6
Barbara Potter holds a 6–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 4–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1984 Houston third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1984* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 6-1 6-4 | Kim Sands | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 7-6 6-4 | Kim Sands | Match data |
| Jan 22, 1982* | Seattle | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Kim Sands | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1981* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 6-3 6-4 | Kim Sands | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1981* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Barbara Potter | 6-3 6-3 | Kim Sands | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1978* | Minneapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | 4-6 7-6 6-2 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Barbara Potter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |