H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 0-1

Catherine Tanvier holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1985 Roland Garros round of 64 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Sands
USA Age 70
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catherine Tanvier #30 6-4 6-4 Kim Sands Match data May 30, 1985* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Sands — — — 1,714 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Catherine Tanvier — #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Catherine Tanvier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,801 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,827 0 0
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,778 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0
21 1978 4–4 50.0% — 1,511 0 0 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0
22 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,619 0 0
23 1980 11–22 33.3% — 1,584 0 0 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0
24 1981 9–21 30.0% — 1,561 0 0 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,674 0 0
25 1982 3–16 15.8% — 1,503 0 0 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0
26 1983 12–13 48.0% — 1,623 0 0 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0
27 1984 10–23 30.3% — 1,557 0 0 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0
28 1985 3–8 27.3% — 1,546 0 0 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0
29 1986 1–10 9.1% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1987 0–3 0.0% — 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Sands Catherine Tanvier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1978 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
22 1979 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1980 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 18 35 53 34.0% 9 30 39 23.1% 12 24 36 33.3% 14 33 47 29.8% — 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Sands Catherine Tanvier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1546 111.1 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 — +0.78
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1541 110.4 — — — — +70 +73 +7 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1801 146.0 — — — — -101 -57 -142 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1827 138.9 — — — — +19 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.11
19 1976 1489 94.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17 1984 1779 138.5 — — — — +11 +66 -120 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.73
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1776 132.0 — — — — -9 +34 -112 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
21 1978 1512 108.5 — — — — — — +52 57.1% +0.72 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +1.69 1986 1826 142.1 — — — — +18 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.62
22 1979 1490 96.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.16 1987 1620 113.3 — — — — +55 +14 +54 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.21
23 1980 1585 119.5 — — — — +8 -112 -47 32.5% -1.52 8–3 (73%) 1–3 (25%) 105.8 -0.99 1988 1604 122.5 — — — — +8 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — -0.94
24 1981 1561 111.8 — — — — -7 -101 +49 35.7% -1.06 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — +0.93 1989 1674 141.1 — — — — -10 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.88
25 1982 1504 104.2 — — — — +6 -144 +77 23.3% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -0.89 1990 1658 111.6 — — — — -1 -82 +74 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 — +0.74
26 1983 1623 121.3 — — — — -14 -159 -26 51.6% 0.00 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 +1.31 1991 1604 113.4 — — — — +31 -74 — 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59
27 1984 1558 126.0 — — — — +50 -118 -7 31.9% -1.14 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.6 -1.96 1992 1614 106.2 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.57 2–0 — — +1.48
28 1985 1547 110.1 — — — — +26 -109 — 33.3% -1.26 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.22 1993 1579 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.11
29 1986 1481 109.2 — — — — +11 — — 20.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.5 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1457 103.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1715 119.3 — — — — +13 -124 +20 34.9% -1.08 23–37 (38%) 10–19 (34%) 92.3 +0.14 — 1880 137.1 — — — — +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.