H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Kim Sands vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 1-1

Kim Sands and Claudia Kohde Kilsch are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kim Sands leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1985 Oakland third round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Sands
Age 69
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 21, 1985* Oakland WTA 250 R32 Carpet Claudia Kohde Kilsch #8 6-1 6-2 Kim Sands Match data
Jun 10, 1981* Surbiton WTA 250 R64 Grass Kim Sands 6-3 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Sands — — — 1,714 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Claudia Kohde Kilsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5
18 — — — — — — — 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8
20 — — — — — — — 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9
21 1978 4–4 50.0% — 1,511 0 0 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10
22 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10
23 1980 11–22 33.3% — 1,583 0 0 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10
24 1981 9–21 30.0% — 1,561 0 0 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11
25 1982 3–16 15.8% — 1,504 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11
26 1983 12–13 48.0% — 1,623 0 0 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12
27 1984 10–23 30.3% — 1,558 0 0 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12
28 1985 3–8 27.3% — 1,546 0 0 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12
29 1986 1–10 9.1% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1987 0–3 0.0% — 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —