H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kim Sands vs Etsuko Inoue H2H: 0-1
Etsuko Inoue holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Etsuko Inoue leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Etsuko Inoue won the 1986 Birmingham second round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1986* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Etsuko Inoue | 6-4 7-6 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 132 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Etsuko Inoue | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |