H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 1-0

Kim Sands holds a 1–0 lead over Florenta Mihai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Sands leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1980 Detroit round of 64 6-2 3-6 6-1.

USA Age 69
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Sands 6-2 3-6 6-1 Florenta Mihai Match data Feb 20, 1980* R64 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Sands 1,713 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Florenta Mihai 1,799 89 90 49.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Florenta Mihai
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1974 3–2 60.0% 1,515 0 0
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0 1975 4–5 44.4% 1,508 0 0
20 1976 13–16 44.8% 1,634 0 0
21 1978 4–4 50.0% 1,512 0 0 1977 16–13 55.2% 1,774 0 1
22 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,490 0 0 1978 7–20 25.9% 1,642 0 1
23 1980 11–22 33.3% 1,583 0 0 1979 7–9 43.8% 1,615 0 1
24 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,560 0 0 1980 7–9 43.8% 1,578 0 1
25 1982 3–16 15.8% 1,502 0 0 1981 30–13 69.8% 1,652 0 3
26 1983 12–13 48.0% 1,622 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,618 0 3
27 1984 10–23 30.3% 1,557 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% 1,624 0 3
28 1985 3–8 27.3% 1,545 0 0
29 1986 1–10 9.1% 1,479 0 0
30 1987 0–3 0.0% 1,455 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Sands Florenta Mihai
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1974 3 2 5 60.0%
19 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1976 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1978 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
23 1980 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 1979 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 1980 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1981 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 18 35 53 34.0% 9 30 39 23.1% 12 24 36 33.3% 14 33 47 29.8% 3 10 13 23.1% 39 27 66 59.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 9 22 31 29.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Sands Florenta Mihai
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1974 1516 105.0 +18 63.6% +1.18 0–1 0–1 +1.34
19 1976 1489 94.4 0.0% -5.50 -0.17 1975 1509 103.6 50.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 +1.56
20 1976 1634 124.5 -65 +1 -51 41.8% -0.45 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 107.6 +0.91
21 1978 1512 108.5 +52 57.1% +0.72 1–4 (20%) 0–1 +1.67 1977 1774 133.4 -215 +53 52.9% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 106.6 +0.88
22 1979 1490 96.5 20.0% -1.60 0–1 +0.15 1978 1643 119.2 -37 +89 -110 25.9% -1.90 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.0 -1.87
23 1980 1583 118.8 +6 -110 -44 32.5% -1.52 8–3 (73%) 1–3 (25%) 105.8 -0.85 1979 1615 118.8 -69 -31 43.3% -0.43 1–1 0–1 +0.94
24 1981 1560 111.4 -8 -100 +50 35.7% -1.06 3–7 (30%) 1–1 +0.95 1980 1579 102.2 +168 -47 47.5% -0.47 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.23
25 1982 1503 104.0 +5 -143 +77 23.3% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -0.85 1981 1652 129.6 +130 67.7% +1.51 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 99.8 +2.54
26 1983 1623 121.1 -14 -159 -27 51.6% 0.00 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 +1.37 1982 1618 104.2 +106 50.0% +0.38 0–2 +0.59
27 1984 1557 125.8 +50 -118 -7 31.9% -1.14 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.6 -1.83 1983 1625 105.5 40.0% -1.80 1–0 +0.05
28 1985 1546 109.7 +25 -108 33.3% -1.26 2–3 (40%) 1–1 +0.26
29 1986 1480 109.1 +10 20.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.5 +0.18
30 1987 1456 103.5 14.3% -2.28 0–1 -0.17
Career 1714 119.0 +12 -124 +20 34.9% -1.08 23–37 (38%) 10–19 (34%) 92.4 +0.40 1800 126.9 -97 +66 -73 49.3% -0.08 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 101.3 +4.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.