H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Grace Kim H2H: 0-1

Grace Kim holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grace Kim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grace Kim won the 1985 Key Biscayne round of 64 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Sands
USA Age 70
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Grace Kim
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grace Kim 6-3 6-4 Kim Sands Match data Jan 23, 1985* R64 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Sands — — — 1,714 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,586 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,592 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1
21 1978 4–4 50.0% — 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1980 11–22 33.3% — 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1981 9–21 30.0% — 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1982 3–16 15.8% — 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1983 12–13 48.0% — 1,623 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1984 10–23 30.3% — 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1985 3–8 27.3% — 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1986 1–10 9.1% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1987 0–3 0.0% — 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Sands Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.40
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1592 116.1 — — — — +64 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1622 113.9 — — — — +26 — +20 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.34
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1695 125.4 — — — — +51 -205 -136 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.71
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1606 117.9 — — — — +47 -127 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 +0.14
19 1976 1489 94.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +46 — -16 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.11
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26
21 1978 1512 108.5 — — — — — — +52 57.1% +0.72 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 1490 96.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 1585 119.5 — — — — +8 -112 -47 32.5% -1.52 8–3 (73%) 1–3 (25%) 105.8 -0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1561 111.8 — — — — -7 -101 +49 35.7% -1.06 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1504 104.2 — — — — +6 -144 +77 23.3% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1623 121.3 — — — — -14 -159 -26 51.6% 0.00 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 +1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1558 126.0 — — — — +50 -118 -7 31.9% -1.14 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.6 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1547 110.1 — — — — +26 -109 — 33.3% -1.26 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1481 109.2 — — — — +11 — — 20.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.5 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1457 103.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1715 119.3 — — — — +13 -124 +20 34.9% -1.08 23–37 (38%) 10–19 (34%) 92.3 +0.14 — 1706 119.2 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.