H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kim Sands vs Gretchen Magers H2H: 1-1
Kim Sands and Gretchen Magers are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gretchen Magers leads 1–0 on grass, while Kim Sands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1984 Mahwah third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 69
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1984* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kim Sands | 6-3 6-2 | Gretchen Magers | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1984* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Gretchen Magers | 0-6 6-3 10-8 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gretchen Magers | #433 | #3 | 40 | 1,905 | 152 | 127 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Gretchen Magers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #3 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #52 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #29 | 1,891 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |