H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kim Sands vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 0-1
Isabel Cueto holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabel Cueto leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1987 Charleston second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1987* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-1 6-4 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |