H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kim Sands vs Iva Budarova H2H: 0-2
Iva Budarova holds a 2–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iva Budarova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1984 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1984* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 6-3 6-2 | Kim Sands | Match data |
| May 26, 1982* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Iva Budarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |