H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Kim Sands vs Jo Durie H2H: 0-1

Jo Durie holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo Durie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1982 Birmingham second round 6-4 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Sands
Age 69
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 9, 1982* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Jo Durie 6-4 5-7 6-4 Kim Sands Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Sands — — — 1,714 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4
20 — — — — — — — 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1978 4–4 50.0% — 1,511 0 0 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9
23 1980 11–22 33.3% — 1,583 0 0 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9
24 1981 9–21 30.0% — 1,561 0 0 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9
25 1982 3–16 15.8% — 1,504 0 0 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1983 12–13 48.0% — 1,623 0 0 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 1984 10–23 30.3% — 1,558 0 0 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9
28 1985 3–8 27.3% — 1,546 0 0 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 1986 1–10 9.1% — 1,480 0 0 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9
30 1987 0–3 0.0% — 1,456 0 0 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9