H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kim Sands vs Lele Forood H2H: 2-1
Kim Sands holds a 2–1 lead over Lele Forood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Kim Sands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1983 Tampa third round 6-4 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1983* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kim Sands | 6-4 1-6 6-2 | Lele Forood | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1983* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kim Sands | 7-6 6-4 | Lele Forood | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lele Forood | 6-1 7-5 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lele Forood | — | — | — | 1,684 | 54 | 96 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Lele Forood | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 4–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |