H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 0-3

Mareen Louie Harper holds a 3–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mareen Louie Harper leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1984 US Open round of 128 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Sands
USA Age 69
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mareen Louie Harper 6-4 6-3 Kim Sands Match data Aug 30, 1984* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Mareen Louie Harper 4-6 7-6 6-4 Kim Sands Match data Oct 1, 1981* R32 Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet
Mareen Louie Harper 7-5 6-1 Kim Sands Match data Jun 20, 1980* R16 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Sands — — — 1,713 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,910 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,568 0 0
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,714 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0
21 1978 4–4 50.0% — 1,512 0 0 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0
22 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,671 0 0
23 1980 11–22 33.3% — 1,583 0 0 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1
24 1981 9–21 30.0% — 1,560 0 0 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,776 0 2
25 1982 3–16 15.8% — 1,502 0 0 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,679 0 2
26 1983 12–13 48.0% — 1,622 0 0 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 1984 10–23 30.3% — 1,557 0 0 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 1985 3–8 27.3% — 1,545 0 0 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 1986 1–10 9.1% — 1,479 0 0 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 1987 0–3 0.0% — 1,455 0 0 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,536 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Sands Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1978 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1979 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1980 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 18 35 53 34.0% 9 30 39 23.1% 12 24 36 33.3% 14 33 47 29.8% — 104 118 222 46.8% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Sands Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1520 116.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1589 122.4 — — — — +31 -31 — 34.1% -1.25 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) 108.1 -0.33
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1568 121.3 — — — — +25 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.42
19 1976 1489 94.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17 1980 1714 128.5 — — — — -41 -153 -36 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.6 +1.57
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1743 134.3 — — — — -2 — -72 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 -1.63
21 1978 1512 108.5 — — — — — — +52 57.1% +0.72 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +1.67 1982 1655 124.8 — — — — -27 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.27
22 1979 1490 96.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.15 1983 1671 132.0 — — — — -14 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.4 -0.99
23 1980 1583 118.8 — — — — +6 -110 -44 32.5% -1.52 8–3 (73%) 1–3 (25%) 105.8 -0.85 1984 1733 127.5 — — — — +24 — -94 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.67
24 1981 1560 111.4 — — — — -8 -100 +50 35.7% -1.06 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — +0.95 1985 1777 143.7 — — — — +52 — -157 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.01
25 1982 1503 104.0 — — — — +5 -143 +77 23.3% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -0.85 1986 1680 121.2 — — — — +20 — -65 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.39
26 1983 1623 121.1 — — — — -14 -159 -27 51.6% 0.00 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 +1.37 1987 1624 119.5 — — — — +6 — -17 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.33
27 1984 1557 125.8 — — — — +50 -118 -7 31.9% -1.14 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.6 -1.83 1988 1614 129.1 — — — — +11 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.29
28 1985 1546 109.7 — — — — +25 -108 — 33.3% -1.26 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.26 1989 1576 117.3 — — — — -17 — -21 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.33
29 1986 1480 109.1 — — — — +10 — — 20.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.5 +0.18 1990 1590 128.4 — — — — +10 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 1987 1456 103.5 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 — — -0.17 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.4 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1714 119.0 — — — — +12 -124 +20 34.9% -1.08 23–37 (38%) 10–19 (34%) 92.4 +0.40 — 1911 135.2 — — — — +7 -78 -59 42.4% -0.57 76–56 (58%) 40–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.