Kim Sands
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 6, 1986 | H2H |
| Barbara Potter | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 2, 1984 | H2H |
| Candy Reynolds | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 27, 1986 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 26, 1985 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 11, 1983 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 2–1 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kim Sands leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1986 Houston round of 32 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | 6-1 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data | May 8, 1986* | R32 | Houston | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Mary Lou Piatek | 6-1 6-1 | Kim Sands | Match data | Jan 22, 1984* | F | Denver | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Mary Lou Piatek | 7-6 6-2 | Kim Sands | Match data | Jan 28, 1982* | R32 | Chicago | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,938 | 157 | 207 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kim Sands | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Kim Sands | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1979 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 1980 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1980 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% |
| 1981 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 1981 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% |
| 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1982 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% |
| 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1983 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 1984 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1984 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 1985 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1985 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 1986 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1986 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 1987 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 18 | 35 | 53 | 34.0% | 9 | 30 | 39 | 23.1% | 12 | 24 | 36 | 33.3% | 14 | 33 | 47 | 29.8% | Career | 75 | 85 | 160 | 46.9% | 17 | 32 | 49 | 34.7% | 12 | 29 | 41 | 29.3% | 53 | 61 | 114 | 46.5% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Kim Sands | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1976 | 1489 | 94.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.17 | 1978 | 1499 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.11 |
| 1978 | 1512 | 108.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +52 | 57.1% | +0.72 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–1 | — | +1.69 | 1979 | 1547 | 118.3 | — | — | — | — | +98 | — | — | 42.1% | -0.89 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.12 |
| 1979 | 1490 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 | 1980 | 1763 | 137.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -186 | — | 57.7% | +0.61 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.65 |
| 1980 | 1585 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -112 | -47 | 32.5% | -1.52 | 8–3 (73%) | 1–3 (25%) | 105.8 | -0.99 | 1981 | 1875 | 146.3 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -198 | -301 | 56.7% | +0.48 | 8–10 (44%) | 6–5 (55%) | 100.9 | -2.75 |
| 1981 | 1561 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -101 | +49 | 35.7% | -1.06 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–1 | — | +0.93 | 1982 | 1794 | 142.2 | — | — | — | — | +59 | -196 | -212 | 47.1% | -0.08 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.6 | -0.89 |
| 1982 | 1504 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -144 | +77 | 23.3% | -1.88 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.7 | -0.89 | 1983 | 1722 | 143.9 | — | — | — | — | +55 | -87 | — | 41.3% | -0.43 | 4–7 (36%) | 0–5 (0%) | 91.3 | -4.11 |
| 1983 | 1623 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | -14 | -159 | -26 | 51.6% | 0.00 | 5–9 (36%) | 3–2 (60%) | 99.7 | +1.31 | 1984 | 1704 | 128.6 | — | — | — | — | -14 | — | -70 | 47.7% | -0.47 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | 100.9 | -0.88 |
| 1984 | 1558 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +50 | -118 | -7 | 31.9% | -1.14 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–5 (29%) | 98.6 | -1.96 | 1985 | 1678 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | -28 | -65 | -67 | 43.1% | -0.61 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.7 | +1.98 |
| 1985 | 1547 | 110.1 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -109 | — | 33.3% | -1.26 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–1 | — | +0.22 | 1986 | 1619 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | -25 | 38.5% | -0.67 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | 95.5 | +1.45 |
| 1986 | 1481 | 109.2 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–4 (0%) | 93.5 | +0.09 | 1987 | 1595 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.78 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.12 |
| 1987 | 1457 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.28 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.14 | 1988 | 1543 | 116.2 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -44 | — | 30.8% | -1.31 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -0.58 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1593 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -117 | — | 31.4% | -1.65 | 5–2 (71%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.3 | -2.73 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1612 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -86 | — | 43.9% | -0.63 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1630 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | — | 41.4% | -0.31 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.69 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1560 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | -16 | — | — | 23.8% | -2.00 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–2 | — | -0.39 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1555 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | -21 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.16 |
| Career | 1715 | 119.3 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -124 | +20 | 34.9% | -1.08 | 23–37 (38%) | 10–19 (34%) | 92.3 | +0.14 | Career | 1938 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -129 | -156 | 44.3% | -0.42 | 47–56 (46%) | 21–34 (38%) | 92.7 | -2.59 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 6, 1986 | H2H |
| Barbara Potter | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 2, 1984 | H2H |
| Candy Reynolds | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 27, 1986 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 26, 1985 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 11, 1983 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | 5 | 5 | 10 | Mar 31, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 8 | 1 | 9 | Sep 26, 1986 | H2H |
| Anne Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Feb 14, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 8 | 8 | Dec 2, 1984 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 22, 1990 | H2H |