H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kim Sands vs Patty Fendick H2H: 1-0
Kim Sands holds a 1–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Sands leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1983 Roland Garros first round 2-6 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kim Sands | 2-6 7-6 6-2 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |