H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kim Sands vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 1-0

Kim Sands holds a 1–0 lead over Raffaella Reggi Concato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Sands leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1981 Perugia round of 64 6-2 6-2.

USA Age 69
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
ITA Age 60 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Sands 6-2 6-2 Raffaella Reggi Concato Match data May 6, 1981* R64 Perugia WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Sands 1,713 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Raffaella Reggi Concato 1,929 260 178 59.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Raffaella Reggi Concato
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 1–1 50.0% 1,484 0 0
15 1981 0–5 0.0% 1,421 0 0
16 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,413 0 0
17 1983 21–20 51.2% 1,668 0 0
18 1984 17–14 54.8% 1,753 0 0
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0 1985 26–19 57.8% 1,783 0 1
20 1986 31–20 60.8% 1,896 0 3
21 1978 4–4 50.0% 1,512 0 0 1987 39–21 65.0% 1,903 0 4
22 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,490 0 0 1988 30–16 65.2% 1,911 0 4
23 1980 11–22 33.3% 1,583 0 0 1989 39–22 63.9% 1,855 0 4
24 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,560 0 0 1990 31–16 66.0% 1,816 0 5
25 1982 3–16 15.8% 1,502 0 0 1991 11–11 50.0% 1,707 0 5
26 1983 12–13 48.0% 1,622 0 0 1992 14–12 53.8% 1,723 0 5
27 1984 10–23 30.3% 1,557 0 0
28 1985 3–8 27.3% 1,545 0 0
29 1986 1–10 9.1% 1,479 0 0
30 1987 0–3 0.0% 1,455 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Sands Raffaella Reggi Concato
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1980 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1981 0 2 2 0.0%
16 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 20 8 28 71.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1986 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1978 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 20 10 30 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 1980 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 1989 20 11 31 64.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 1990 22 12 34 64.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 18 35 53 34.0% 9 30 39 23.1% 12 24 36 33.3% 14 33 47 29.8% 101 67 168 60.1% 102 57 159 64.2% 23 17 40 57.5% 34 34 68 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Sands Raffaella Reggi Concato
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1980 1485 95.1 0.0% -4.50 +0.13
15 1981 1421 91.5 23.1% -2.39 0–3 (0%) +0.25
16 1982 1414 94.1 0.0% -4.50 -0.02
17 1983 1668 126.0 +22 -51 -55 47.3% -0.21 9–2 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 109.6 -0.02
18 1984 1753 129.4 -112 +30 -123 55.2% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.3 -1.00
19 1976 1489 94.4 0.0% -5.50 -0.17 1985 1783 138.4 -146 +128 54.2% +0.26 11–6 (65%) 4–5 (44%) 102.7 +0.03
20 1986 1896 151.8 -61 +68 -239 57.6% +0.70 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 105.3 -1.91
21 1978 1512 108.5 +52 57.1% +0.72 1–4 (20%) 0–1 +1.67 1987 1904 144.7 -19 +25 -206 62.5% +0.81 9–9 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 99.9 -0.62
22 1979 1490 96.5 20.0% -1.60 0–1 +0.15 1988 1912 144.0 +15 -21 -182 61.0% +0.50 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 106.8 -1.20
23 1980 1583 118.8 +6 -110 -44 32.5% -1.52 8–3 (73%) 1–3 (25%) 105.8 -0.85 1989 1856 141.4 -4 +23 -73 59.4% +0.69 12–8 (60%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 +0.65
24 1981 1560 111.4 -8 -100 +50 35.7% -1.06 3–7 (30%) 1–1 +0.95 1990 1816 142.9 +36 +78 -27 61.5% +0.89 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) 100.3 +0.44
25 1982 1503 104.0 +5 -143 +77 23.3% -1.88 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -0.85 1991 1707 117.7 +35 +164 49.0% -0.35 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +1.53
26 1983 1623 121.1 -14 -159 -27 51.6% 0.00 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 +1.37 1992 1723 128.2 +7 +121 52.5% -0.02 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) 103.2 -0.10
27 1984 1557 125.8 +50 -118 -7 31.9% -1.14 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.6 -1.83
28 1985 1546 109.7 +25 -108 33.3% -1.26 2–3 (40%) 1–1 +0.26
29 1986 1480 109.1 +10 20.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.5 +0.18
30 1987 1456 103.5 14.3% -2.28 0–1 -0.17
Career 1714 119.0 +12 -124 +20 34.9% -1.08 23–37 (38%) 10–19 (34%) 92.4 +0.40 1930 143.8 -14 +46 -117 56.4% +0.38 82–52 (61%) 47–22 (68%) 113.8 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.