H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kim Sands vs Sabina Simmonds H2H: 0-2
Sabina Simmonds holds a 2–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sabina Simmonds leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sabina Simmonds won the 1983 Marco Island second round 1-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1983* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Sabina Simmonds | 1-6 6-2 7-5 | Kim Sands | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sabina Simmonds | 6-1 6-3 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sabina Simmonds | — | — | — | 1,830 | 108 | 122 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Sabina Simmonds | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |