H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kim Sands vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 1-2
Stacy Margolin holds a 2–1 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Stacy Margolin leads 2–0 on carpet, while Kim Sands leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1982 Lugano second round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1982* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Kim Sands | 7-6 6-3 | Stacy Margolin | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1981* | Seattle | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Stacy Margolin | 6-1 6-4 | Kim Sands | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1980* | Boston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Stacy Margolin | 6-1 6-2 | Kim Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stacy Margolin | — | — | — | 1,855 | 73 | 98 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Stacy Margolin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 16–5 | 76.2% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |