H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kim Sands vs Terry Holladay H2H: 1-0
Kim Sands holds a 1–0 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Sands leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1980 Eastbourne third round 2-6 6-4 10-8.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 69
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1980* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Kim Sands | 2-6 6-4 10-8 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Terry Holladay | #395 | #39 | 7 | 1,935 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Sands | Terry Holladay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #50 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |