H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Kim Sands vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-4

Zina Garrison holds a 4–0 lead over Kim Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1985 New Orleans third round 6-2 6-1.

Age 69
H2H
0 4
4 main draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 26, 1985* New Orleans WTA 250 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison #6 6-2 6-1 Kim Sands Match data
Jan 2, 1984 Washington WTA 250 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison #12 6-3 6-4 Kim Sands Match data
Oct 14, 1983* Tampa WTA 250 R16 Hard Zina Garrison 7-5 6-3 Kim Sands Match data
Mar 5, 1981* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison 6-2 3-6 6-0 Kim Sands Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Sands 1,714 53 123 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Sands Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–2 50.0% 1,529 0 1
17 1981 5–5 50.0% 1,568 0 1
18 1982 23–15 60.5% 1,853 0 1
19 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0 1983 38–18 67.9% 1,989 0 1
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1978 4–4 50.0% 1,511 0 0 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,490 0 0 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1980 11–22 33.3% 1,583 0 0 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,561 0 0 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 1982 3–16 15.8% 1,504 0 0 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 1983 12–13 48.0% 1,623 0 0 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 1984 10–23 30.3% 1,558 0 0 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 1985 3–8 27.3% 1,546 0 0 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 1986 1–10 9.1% 1,480 0 0 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 1987 0–3 0.0% 1,456 0 0 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15