H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Steinmetz vs Andrea Leand H2H: 0-1

Andrea Leand holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Steinmetz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Leand leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Leand won the 1984 Tampa round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Steinmetz
USA Age 68
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Leand
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Leand #36 6-4 6-3 Kim Steinmetz #104 Match data Oct 11, 1984* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Steinmetz #625 #99 6 1,649 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andrea Leand #857 #27 13 1,881 83 104 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Steinmetz Andrea Leand
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1981 4–3 57.1% — 1,563 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1982 29–22 56.9% — 1,812 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1983 17–18 48.6% — 1,784 0 0
20 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1984 19–18 51.4% #35 1,774 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1985 1–5 16.7% #33 1,681 0 1
22 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,593 0 0 1986 0–3 0.0% #214 1,627 0 1
23 1981 6–12 33.3% — 1,552 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1982 12–12 50.0% — 1,626 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #296 1,607 0 1
25 1983 6–15 28.6% — 1,547 0 0 1989 3–7 30.0% #152 1,579 0 1
26 1984 6–8 42.9% #102 1,570 0 0 1990 6–15 28.6% #142 1,516 0 1
27 1985 0–7 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1991 4–9 30.8% #180 1,504 0 1
28 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1987 0–2 0.0% #215 1,447 0 0 1993 0–2 0.0% #341 1,473 0 1
30 1988 7–10 41.2% #133 1,506 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #461 1,472 0 1
31 1989 0–4 0.0% #478 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1991 0–1 0.0% #496 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Steinmetz Andrea Leand
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 8 17 52.9%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1980 — — — — 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1988 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1989 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 28 40 30.0% 19 20 39 48.7% 15 21 36 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% — 37 36 73 50.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 10 18 28 35.7% 20 30 50 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Steinmetz Andrea Leand
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1564 118.3 — — — — +112 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.64
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1813 151.1 — — — — +80 -158 -211 58.6% +0.34 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -2.70
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1785 132.5 — — — — +54 -45 -182 48.8% -0.18 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 -1.64
20 1978 1488 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.07 1984 1775 142.9 — — — — +39 -6 -186 53.3% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 2–5 (29%) 91.3 -0.75
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1681 93.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.92 — — — +0.61
22 1980 1593 118.4 — — — — — +79 — 71.0% +1.64 1–0 2–2 (50%) — +2.46 1986 1628 92.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — +0.24
23 1981 1552 109.7 — — — — +36 +106 +7 35.1% -0.54 0–1 0–4 (0%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1982 1626 120.3 — — — — -98 +40 +17 49.2% -0.21 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.70 1988 1608 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14
25 1983 1548 112.1 — — — — -19 +105 +39 34.8% -0.78 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.14 1989 1579 123.9 — — — — +89 — — 34.8% -1.13 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 +0.47
26 1984 1571 110.2 — — — — -91 — +101 43.3% -0.40 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.44 1990 1517 111.0 — — — — +34 — +59 29.2% -1.79 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.82
27 1985 1478 88.9 — — — — -31 +49 — 12.5% -2.56 0–2 — — +0.89 1991 1505 113.3 — — — — +4 — — 34.6% -1.46 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.52
28 1986 1468 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 1448 100.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.14 1993 1474 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.38
30 1988 1507 108.7 — — — — -42 — +55 39.5% -0.60 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 103.2 +0.61 1994 1472 108.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32
31 1989 1471 98.2 — — — — -32 — — 20.0% -2.30 0–2 0–1 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 1460 93.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 113.2 — — — — -38 +74 +45 40.6% -0.55 12–19 (39%) 9–16 (36%) 93.3 +4.98 — 1882 138.5 — — — — +56 -85 -134 46.4% -0.44 29–34 (46%) 15–19 (44%) 98.3 -0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.