H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kim Steinmetz vs Camille Benjamin H2H: 0-1
Camille Benjamin holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Steinmetz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camille Benjamin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1988 San Juan fourth round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1988* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Camille Benjamin | 6-4 7-6 | Kim Steinmetz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Steinmetz | #625 | #99 | 6 | 1,646 | 49 | 80 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camille Benjamin | #1,000 | #27 | 13 | 1,834 | 177 | 223 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Steinmetz | Camille Benjamin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 22–29 | 43.1% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #79 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #67 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #91 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #102 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #251 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 0–7 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1988 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #133 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #478 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |