H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kim Steinmetz vs Laura Garrone H2H: 0-1
Laura Garrone holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Steinmetz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Garrone leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Garrone won the 1985 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Laura Garrone | 6-1 6-1 | Kim Steinmetz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Steinmetz | #625 | #99 | 6 | 1,646 | 49 | 80 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Garrone | #262 | #32 | 90 | 1,726 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Steinmetz | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #156 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #102 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 0–7 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1988 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #133 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #478 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |