H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kim Steinmetz vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-1

Kim Steinmetz and Mareen Louie Harper are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Steinmetz leads 1–0 on grass, while Mareen Louie Harper leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1984 Indianapolis Indoors round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Steinmetz
USA Age 68
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mareen Louie Harper 6-3 6-4 Kim Steinmetz Match data Feb 2, 1984* R32 Indianapolis Indoors WTA 250 Hard
Kim Steinmetz 4-6 6-3 7-5 Mareen Louie Harper Match data Jun 23, 1982* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Steinmetz #625 #99 6 1,649 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,910 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Steinmetz Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,568 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,714 0 0
20 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0
22 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,593 0 0 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,671 0 0
23 1981 6–12 33.3% — 1,552 0 0 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1
24 1982 12–12 50.0% — 1,626 0 0 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,776 0 2
25 1983 6–15 28.6% — 1,547 0 0 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,679 0 2
26 1984 6–8 42.9% #102 1,570 0 0 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 1985 0–7 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,467 0 0 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 1987 0–2 0.0% #215 1,447 0 0 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 1988 7–10 41.2% #133 1,506 0 0 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 1989 0–4 0.0% #478 1,470 0 0 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 1991 0–1 0.0% #496 1,460 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,536 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Steinmetz Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1980 — — — — 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1988 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 1989 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 28 40 30.0% 19 20 39 48.7% 15 21 36 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% — 104 118 222 46.8% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Steinmetz Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1520 116.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1589 122.4 — — — — +31 -31 — 34.1% -1.25 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) 108.1 -0.33
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1568 121.3 — — — — +25 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.42
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1714 128.5 — — — — -41 -153 -36 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.6 +1.57
20 1978 1488 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.07 1981 1743 134.3 — — — — -2 — -72 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 -1.63
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1655 124.8 — — — — -27 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.27
22 1980 1593 118.4 — — — — — +79 — 71.0% +1.64 1–0 2–2 (50%) — +2.46 1983 1671 132.0 — — — — -14 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.4 -0.99
23 1981 1552 109.7 — — — — +36 +106 +7 35.1% -0.54 0–1 0–4 (0%) — +0.13 1984 1733 127.5 — — — — +24 — -94 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.67
24 1982 1626 120.3 — — — — -98 +40 +17 49.2% -0.21 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.70 1985 1777 143.7 — — — — +52 — -157 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.01
25 1983 1548 112.1 — — — — -19 +105 +39 34.8% -0.78 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.14 1986 1680 121.2 — — — — +20 — -65 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.39
26 1984 1571 110.2 — — — — -91 — +101 43.3% -0.40 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.44 1987 1624 119.5 — — — — +6 — -17 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.33
27 1985 1478 88.9 — — — — -31 +49 — 12.5% -2.56 0–2 — — +0.89 1988 1614 129.1 — — — — +11 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.29
28 1986 1468 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.13 1989 1576 117.3 — — — — -17 — -21 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.33
29 1987 1448 100.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.14 1990 1590 128.4 — — — — +10 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 1988 1507 108.7 — — — — -42 — +55 39.5% -0.60 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 103.2 +0.61 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 1989 1471 98.2 — — — — -32 — — 20.0% -2.30 0–2 0–1 — -0.08 1992 1545 105.4 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 1991 1460 93.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1650 113.2 — — — — -38 +74 +45 40.6% -0.55 12–19 (39%) 9–16 (36%) 93.3 +4.98 — 1911 135.2 — — — — +7 -78 -59 42.4% -0.57 76–56 (58%) 40–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.