H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kim Steinmetz vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 1-4
Pilar Vasquez holds a 4–1 lead over Kim Steinmetz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Pilar Vasquez leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pilar Vasquez won the 1983 Salt Lake City third round 3-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1983* | Salt Lake City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Pilar Vasquez | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Kim Steinmetz | Match data |
| May 26, 1982* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kim Steinmetz | 6-1 1-6 7-5 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1982* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Pilar Vasquez | 6-7 6-1 6-3 | Kim Steinmetz | Match data |
| Jul 27, 1980* | Tirreni | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Pilar Vasquez | 7-6 6-4 | Kim Steinmetz | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1980* | Lecce | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Pilar Vasquez | 6-0 6-1 | Kim Steinmetz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Steinmetz | #625 | #99 | 6 | 1,646 | 49 | 80 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Steinmetz | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1980 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1982 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1983 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #102 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1985 | 0–7 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1988 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #133 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #478 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |