H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kim Steinmetz vs Sandra Wasserman H2H: 0-1
Sandra Wasserman holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Steinmetz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Wasserman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Wasserman won the 1988 Auckland third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 56
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 1988* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sandra Wasserman | 7-6 6-3 | Kim Steinmetz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Steinmetz | #625 | #99 | 6 | 1,646 | 49 | 80 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandra Wasserman | #747 | #48 | 22 | 1,702 | 77 | 93 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Steinmetz | Sandra Wasserman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #123 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #103 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #135 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #112 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #102 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1985 | 0–7 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1988 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #133 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #478 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |