H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Steinmetz vs Sandra Wasserman H2H: 0-1

Sandra Wasserman holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Steinmetz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Wasserman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Wasserman won the 1988 ASB Classic round of 32 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Steinmetz
USA Age 68
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sandra Wasserman
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Wasserman #118 7-6 6-3 Kim Steinmetz #220 Match data Jan 28, 1988* R32 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Steinmetz #625 #99 6 1,649 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Wasserman #747 #48 22 1,701 77 93 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Steinmetz Sandra Wasserman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1987 7–4 63.6% #123 1,596 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 19–18 51.4% #63 1,643 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1989 18–17 51.4% #69 1,632 0 0
20 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1990 12–17 41.4% #103 1,607 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1991 6–10 37.5% #131 1,583 0 0
22 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,593 0 0 1992 3–8 27.3% #135 1,538 0 0
23 1981 6–12 33.3% — 1,552 0 0 1993 8–11 42.1% #112 1,556 0 0
24 1982 12–12 50.0% — 1,626 0 0 1994 4–8 33.3% #198 1,540 0 0
25 1983 6–15 28.6% — 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1984 6–8 42.9% #102 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1985 0–7 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1987 0–2 0.0% #215 1,447 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1988 7–10 41.2% #133 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1989 0–4 0.0% #478 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1991 0–1 0.0% #496 1,460 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Steinmetz Sandra Wasserman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 5 13 61.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 13 8 21 61.9% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1980 — — — — 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1988 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1989 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 28 40 30.0% 19 20 39 48.7% 15 21 36 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% — 42 43 85 49.4% 30 39 69 43.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Steinmetz Sandra Wasserman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1596 125.6 — — — — — +39 — 64.0% +1.32 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.79
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1644 115.1 — — — — -32 +14 -112 51.1% +0.01 8–8 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 100.3 +4.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1633 118.0 — — — — +44 -43 — 50.6% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 0–5 (0%) 96.1 +3.24
20 1978 1488 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.07 1990 1608 122.9 — — — — +64 -90 — 44.1% -0.71 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 98.4 -0.61
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1583 107.2 — — — — +19 -21 — 36.1% -1.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 +0.37
22 1980 1593 118.4 — — — — — +79 — 71.0% +1.64 1–0 2–2 (50%) — +2.46 1992 1539 107.3 — — — — +30 +11 — 33.3% -1.13 0–2 0–1 — +0.37
23 1981 1552 109.7 — — — — +36 +106 +7 35.1% -0.54 0–1 0–4 (0%) — +0.13 1993 1556 112.7 — — — — +1 +2 — 42.9% -0.43 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49
24 1982 1626 120.3 — — — — -98 +40 +17 49.2% -0.21 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.70 1994 1540 109.0 — — — — -5 — — 30.8% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.21
25 1983 1548 112.1 — — — — -19 +105 +39 34.8% -0.78 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1984 1571 110.2 — — — — -91 — +101 43.3% -0.40 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1985 1478 88.9 — — — — -31 +49 — 12.5% -2.56 0–2 — — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 1468 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 1448 100.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1988 1507 108.7 — — — — -42 — +55 39.5% -0.60 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 103.2 +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1989 1471 98.2 — — — — -32 — — 20.0% -2.30 0–2 0–1 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 1460 93.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 113.2 — — — — -38 +74 +45 40.6% -0.55 12–19 (39%) 9–16 (36%) 93.3 +4.98 — 1702 120.3 — — — — +26 -5 -112 45.9% -0.30 25–29 (46%) 16–19 (46%) 95.3 +5.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.