H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kim Steinmetz vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 2-0
Kim Steinmetz holds a 2–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Steinmetz leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Steinmetz won the 1988 Newport third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1988* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Kim Steinmetz | 7-5 6-2 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
| Jun 29, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Kim Steinmetz | 7-6 6-3 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Steinmetz | #625 | #99 | 6 | 1,646 | 49 | 80 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Steinmetz | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1982 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1983 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #102 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1985 | 0–7 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1988 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #133 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #478 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 |