H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kim Steinmetz vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 2-0

Kim Steinmetz holds a 2–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Steinmetz leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Steinmetz won the 1988 Newport round of 32 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Steinmetz
USA Age 68
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Tina Mochizuki
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Steinmetz #187 7-5 6-2 Tina Mochizuki Match data Jul 14, 1988* R32 Newport WTA 250 Grass
Kim Steinmetz 7-6 6-3 Tina Mochizuki Match data Jun 29, 1984* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Steinmetz #625 #99 6 1,649 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tina Mochizuki — — — 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Steinmetz Tina Mochizuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,449 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,424 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 2–3 40.0% — 1,445 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 3–5 37.5% — 1,432 0 0
20 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,463 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,452 0 0
22 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1981 6–12 33.3% — 1,552 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1982 12–12 50.0% — 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1983 6–15 28.6% — 1,547 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,438 0 0
26 1984 6–8 42.9% #102 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1985 0–7 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,552 0 0
28 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,467 0 0 1981 13–7 65.0% — 1,612 0 1
29 1987 0–2 0.0% #215 1,447 0 0 1982 6–3 66.7% — 1,629 0 1
30 1988 7–10 41.2% #133 1,506 0 0 1983 11–13 45.8% — 1,602 0 1
31 1989 0–4 0.0% #478 1,470 0 0 1984 5–17 22.7% — 1,454 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1985 5–12 29.4% — 1,475 0 1
33 1991 0–1 0.0% #496 1,460 0 0 1986 11–19 36.7% — 1,521 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1987 8–25 24.2% — 1,455 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 1988 2–11 15.4% — 1,411 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Steinmetz Tina Mochizuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1980 — — — — 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1988 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
31 1989 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 12 28 40 30.0% 19 20 39 48.7% 15 21 36 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% — 36 62 98 36.7% 9 27 36 25.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 5 12 17 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Steinmetz Tina Mochizuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1484 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1450 94.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.55
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1425 82.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.75 — — — +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1446 105.4 — — — — — +83 — 41.7% -1.67 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.16
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1432 89.9 — — — — +20 +60 — 35.3% -1.53 1–0 1–0 — +1.65
20 1978 1488 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.07 1973 1464 107.3 — — — — +59 — — 54.5% +0.55 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1453 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
22 1980 1593 118.4 — — — — — +79 — 71.0% +1.64 1–0 2–2 (50%) — +2.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1981 1552 109.7 — — — — +36 +106 +7 35.1% -0.54 0–1 0–4 (0%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1982 1626 120.3 — — — — -98 +40 +17 49.2% -0.21 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1983 1548 112.1 — — — — -19 +105 +39 34.8% -0.78 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.14 1978 1438 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
26 1984 1571 110.2 — — — — -91 — +101 43.3% -0.40 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1985 1478 88.9 — — — — -31 +49 — 12.5% -2.56 0–2 — — +0.89 1980 1552 114.3 — — — — +26 — — 58.6% +0.64 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +2.50
28 1986 1468 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.13 1981 1612 122.2 — — — — — — — 61.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.50
29 1987 1448 100.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.14 1982 1630 109.6 — — — — -12 — — 57.9% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +1.68
30 1988 1507 108.7 — — — — -42 — +55 39.5% -0.60 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 103.2 +0.61 1983 1603 109.9 — — — — -3 -38 +4 45.0% -0.18 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +2.25
31 1989 1471 98.2 — — — — -32 — — 20.0% -2.30 0–2 0–1 — -0.08 1984 1454 106.3 — — — — +20 +74 +143 34.6% -0.73 0–8 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 87.8 +1.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1476 106.7 — — — — +39 -8 +73 27.8% -1.78 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.99
33 1991 1460 93.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05 1986 1522 112.2 — — — — +26 -72 +33 36.4% -1.26 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.4 +1.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1455 108.3 — — — — +35 -45 +65 27.4% -1.58 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.7 +0.36
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1412 109.7 — — — — -11 — +90 25.8% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.19
Career — 1650 113.2 — — — — -38 +74 +45 40.6% -0.55 12–19 (39%) 9–16 (36%) 93.3 +4.98 — 1680 112.0 — — — — +21 +8 +60 40.2% -0.71 31–39 (44%) 20–25 (44%) 98.4 +6.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.