H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Kimberly Birrell vs Donna Vekic H2H: 2-2
Kimberly Birrell and Donna Vekic are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kimberly Birrell leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Donna Vekic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kimberly Birrell won the 2025 Chennai quarterfinal 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | Chennai | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Kimberly Birrell | 6-4 6-0 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2025 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Donna Vekic | 6-0 6-4 | Kimberly Birrell | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 6-4 6-4 | Kimberly Birrell | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kimberly Birrell | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimberly Birrell | #65 | #61 | 999 | 1,835 | 47 | 57 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimberly Birrell | Donna Vekic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #516 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #250 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #741 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #113 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2026 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 |