H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kimberly Po Messerli vs Catherine Mothes Jobkel H2H: 1-1
Kimberly Po Messerli and Catherine Mothes Jobkel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Kimberly Po Messerli won the 1994 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kimberly Po Messerli | 6-1 6-1 | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | Match data |
| May 20, 1993* | Lucerne | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | 7-5 6-7 6-2 | Kimberly Po Messerli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Catherine Mothes Jobkel | — | — | — | 1,605 | 22 | 32 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimberly Po Messerli | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |