H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kimiko Date Krumm vs Katarzyna Nowak H2H: 1-0
Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 1–0 lead over Katarzyna Nowak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1995 Roland Garros third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Age 57
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Kimiko Date Krumm | 6-1 6-3 | Katarzyna Nowak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date Krumm | — | — | — | 2,091 | 241 | 188 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Katarzyna Nowak | #855 | #47 | 162 | 1,660 | 26 | 50 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date Krumm | Katarzyna Nowak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #285 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #150 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,987 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | — | 2,029 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 31–13 | 70.5% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #59 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #137 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |