H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kimiko Date Krumm vs Katie Obrien H2H: 1-0
Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 1–0 lead over Katie Obrien in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 2011 Wimbledon first round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kimiko Date Krumm | 6-0 7-5 | Katie Obrien | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date Krumm | — | — | — | 2,091 | 241 | 188 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Katie Obrien | #782 | #84 | 769 | 1,514 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kimiko Date Krumm | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #127 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,987 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #88 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | — | 2,029 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 31–13 | 70.5% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,366 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |