H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kimiko Date Krumm vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 0-1
Kimberly Po Messerli holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimberly Po Messerli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimberly Po Messerli won the 1996 US Open first round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kimberly Po Messerli | 6-2 7-5 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date Krumm | — | — | — | 2,091 | 241 | 188 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date Krumm | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,987 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | — | 2,029 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 31–13 | 70.5% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |