H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Kimiko Date Krumm vs Mana Endo H2H: 3-2

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 3–2 lead over Mana Endo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mana Endo won the 1996 Australian Open second round 6-2 1-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Mana Endo
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mana Endo #64 6-2 1-6 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jan 13, 1995* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-1 Mana Endo #27 Match data
Sep 24, 1994* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 R16 Hard Mana Endo #32 7-5 2-6 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
May 31, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 6-2 Mana Endo #74 Match data
Apr 10, 1992* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-4 Mana Endo #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Mana Endo #381 #26 413 1,819 77 79 49.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Krumm Mana Endo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0 1991 4–6 40.0% #118 1,523 0 0
21 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1 1992 13–10 56.5% #57 1,642 0 0
22 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2 1993 13–12 52.0% #47 1,697 0 0
23 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4 1994 17–10 63.0% #28 1,806 0 1
24 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5 1995 11–14 44.0% #78 1,729 0 1
25 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7 1996 12–13 48.0% #54 1,687 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1997 6–11 35.3% #115 1,591 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1998 1–3 25.0% #316 1,563 0 1
37 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —