H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Kimiko Date Krumm vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 5-3

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 5–3 lead over Naoko Sawamatsu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1996 Tokyo fourth round 7-5 3-6 6-4.

Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
JPN Age 53 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 2, 1996* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Naoko Sawamatsu #21 7-5 3-6 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jan 22, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Naoko Sawamatsu #26 3-6 6-3 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
May 21, 1994* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 6-4 Naoko Sawamatsu #19 Match data
Apr 9, 1994* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 SF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-2 Naoko Sawamatsu #25 Match data
Mar 15, 1994* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-4 Naoko Sawamatsu #28 Match data
May 27, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-7(1) 6-3 Naoko Sawamatsu #32 Match data
Feb 1, 1991* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 R32 Carpet Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 7-5 Naoko Sawamatsu #30 Match data
Apr 15, 1990* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 QF Hard Naoko Sawamatsu #180 6-4 7-6 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date Krumm 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Naoko Sawamatsu #266 #14 881 1,971 182 127 58.9% 0 0 0 3 1 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Krumm Naoko Sawamatsu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 0–2 0.0% #262 1,478 0 0
17 1990 14–6 70.0% #31 1,669 0 1
18 1989 6–5 54.5% 1,562 0 0 1991 21–16 56.8% #33 1,723 0 1
19 1990 10–7 58.8% 1,664 0 0 1992 23–12 65.7% #24 1,865 0 1
20 1991 12–11 52.2% 1,725 0 0 1993 24–13 64.9% #28 1,855 0 2
21 1992 26–13 66.7% 1,867 0 1 1994 24–12 66.7% #26 1,872 0 3
22 1993 25–11 69.4% 1,956 0 2 1995 22–13 62.9% #17 1,848 0 3
23 1994 32–12 72.7% 1,987 0 4 1996 18–16 52.9% #38 1,807 0 3
24 1995 39–12 76.5% 2,029 0 5 1997 24–19 55.8% #34 1,847 0 4
25 1996 31–13 70.5% 2,071 0 7 1998 12–18 40.0% #55 1,720 0 4
37 2008 0–1 0.0% 2,042 0 7
38 2009 6–11 35.3% 1,841 0 8
39 2010 19–18 51.4% 1,814 0 8
40 2011 7–24 22.6% 1,567 0 8
41 2012 2–14 12.5% 1,454 0 8
42 2013 12–15 44.4% 1,575 0 8
43 2014 11–14 44.0% 1,597 0 8
44 2015 3–6 33.3% 1,574 0 8
46 2017 0–1 0.0% 1,564 0 8