H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kimiko Date Krumm vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 1-0
Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Sloane Lundy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1992 Tokyo Nichirei third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1992* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kimiko Date Krumm | 6-0 6-1 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date Krumm | — | — | — | 2,091 | 241 | 188 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kimiko Date Krumm | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,987 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | — | 2,029 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 31–13 | 70.5% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |