H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 0-1

Akgul Amanmuradova holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akgul Amanmuradova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akgul Amanmuradova won the 2010 Cincinnati round of 64 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Akgul Amanmuradova
UZB Age 42 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Akgul Amanmuradova #114 6-1 6-2 Kimiko Date #59 Match data Aug 11, 2010* R64 Cincinnati WTA 1000 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Akgul Amanmuradova #1,097 #50 1,031 1,630 61 102 37.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Akgul Amanmuradova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #607 1,471 0 0
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #307 1,465 0 0
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #380 1,450 0 0
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 2005 5–3 62.5% #197 1,507 0 0
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 2006 1–3 25.0% #204 1,490 0 0
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 2007 8–8 50.0% #96 1,528 0 0
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 2008 15–22 40.5% #82 1,525 0 0
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 2009 8–11 42.1% #85 1,539 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2010 11–15 42.3% #70 1,579 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2011 6–17 26.1% #114 1,492 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2012 3–12 20.0% #198 1,456 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2013 2–3 40.0% #227 1,483 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2014 2–2 50.0% #211 1,482 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #375 1,489 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #459 1,465 0 0
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kimiko Date Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2005 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 2008 9 14 23 39.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 6 4 10 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5% — 46 67 113 40.7% 15 26 41 36.6% 0 9 9 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kimiko Date Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1482 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — +0.19
18 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06 2002 1472 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — -0.07
19 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20 2003 1465 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 -0.15
20 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17 2004 1451 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 +0.11
21 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85 2005 1507 105.0 — — — — +16 — — 63.2% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) +0.63
22 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50 2006 1491 102.4 -0.77 -0.65 0.896 48.1% +3 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 — +0.20
23 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12 2007 1529 108.8 +0.69 -2.00 1.048 51.1% -9 — — 48.6% -0.28 2–3 (40%) 5–1 (83%) +1.87
24 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54 2008 1525 120.6 +0.62 -3.54 0.919 48.6% +1 +77 — 42.2% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) +0.20
25 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14 2009 1539 105.7 +1.49 -2.51 0.958 49.4% +42 +3 — 44.2% -0.14 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) +1.56
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1579 116.9 +1.35 -3.94 0.921 48.4% +27 -59 — 44.4% -0.28 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) +1.49
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1493 104.0 -1.69 -5.44 0.799 45.4% +59 -24 — 33.3% -1.56 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) +0.82
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1456 115.4 +0.74 -4.35 0.787 45.2% +39 +29 — 17.2% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) -0.88
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1483 113.9 +0.82 -2.38 0.797 46.4% +27 — — 40.0% -0.40 — — -0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1482 99.1 +0.09 -1.61 1.015 49.9% +28 — — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 — +0.75
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1503 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1490 91.5 -0.66 -2.71 0.370 29.0% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — +0.05
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1465 97.3 -1.52 -4.67 0.581 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — +0.02
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1466 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03 2021 1433 93.8 — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80 — 1631 113.1 +0.44 -3.64 0.887 47.7% +22 +13 — 39.5% -0.71 15–21 (42%) 22–23 (49%) +3.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.