H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Amy Frazier H2H: 3-1

Kimiko Date holds a 3–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1996 Tokyo final 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateTournamentCategoryRoundSurface
Kimiko Date #9 7-5 6-4 Amy Frazier #26 Match data Apr 21, 1996* Tokyo WTA 500 F Hard
Amy Frazier #18 7-6 7-5 Kimiko Date #8 Match data Apr 16, 1995* Tokyo WTA 500 F Hard
Kimiko Date #9 7-5 6-0 Amy Frazier #26 Match data Apr 10, 1994* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 F Hard
Kimiko Date #25 6-3 6-4 Amy Frazier #18 Match data Apr 11, 1992* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 SF Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,957 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,844 0 3
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,904 0 4
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 — — — — — — — 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,826 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,627 0 8
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —