H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Kimiko Date vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 0-1
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 10-8.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1996* | Atlanta Olympics | Olympics | QF | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 4-6 6-3 10-8 | Kimiko Date | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 1,572 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,384 | 720 | 271 | 72.7% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,066 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,080 | 1 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,167 | 1 | 6 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 63–16 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,283 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #21 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,167 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,111 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 1996 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #8 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,025 | 3 | 24 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,034 | 4 | 26 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,923 | 4 | 27 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,796 | 4 | 29 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 |