H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Kimiko Date vs Catherine Suire H2H: 1-0
Kimiko Date holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Suire in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1989 Birmingham second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 6-2 6-3 | Catherine Suire | Match data | Jun 14, 1989* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,673 | 79 | 129 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Catherine Suire | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #124 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |