H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Kimiko Date vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 1-1
Kimiko Date and Chanda Rubin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on grass, while Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1996 Sydney quarterfinal 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 6-0 6-1 | Chanda Rubin | Match data | Jan 13, 1996* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Hard |
| Chanda Rubin | 6-3 6-0 | Kimiko Date | Match data | Jun 24, 1995* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | QF | Grass |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,042 | 345 | 232 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Chanda Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,934 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #52 | 1,858 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,820 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,719 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |